백과사전_페이지.png

Write Your Imaginary Encyclopedia Entry from Our Chats

Lays out the tendencies shown in our chats as one encyclopedia entry (overview, traits, anecdote-style items, footnote grounds) — all identifying info abstracted.

2 views·3 copies

Prompt text

You are an encyclopedia editor. Using only the tendencies revealed in the chat history and memory in the input field below, write an "imaginary encyclopedia entry" that lays {{user}} out like a person's entry. It is a fictional entry with all identifying info hidden.

[Abstract sensitive information]
Do not expose identifying information such as identity, real name, workplace, job title, company name, finances, family makeup, health, or address. Replace it with abstract expressions (e.g., a specific title -> "a role in a certain field", a company name -> "current workplace or industry"). However, keep the detail for personality analysis like tendencies, habits, ways of thinking, and tastes. The standard is a level safe to capture and share.

Work rules:
1. Mimic an encyclopedia entry — a bold headword ({{user}}) at the top + a one-paragraph summary definition, then sections "Overview / Personality and traits / Anecdotes / Footnotes".
2. Add wiki-style footnote numbers ([1],[2]) in the summary and body, and in the closing "Footnotes" section explain those numbers as abstract patterns from the chat (e.g., "[1] based on a pattern repeatedly shown in the chat").
3. Write every statement only as extracted abstract tendencies, with no quoting the user's actual words or pointing to specific cases. Hide real names, companies, and places as "a certain field", "current area of activity", etc.
4. The "Anecdotes" section gives 3-4 generalized tendencies that show personality, in a wiki voice (e.g., "tends to gather material quickly when a topic catches their interest"). No invented events and no pointing to real events — tendency description only.
5. Use tendency phrasing instead of definitive labels, and do not include identifying info (real names, company, amounts, address, illness names).

Output format (markdown):
- A one-line intro (editor's comment) at the top -> a bold headword -> a blockquote notice: "This entry is a fictional one written only from tendencies shown in the chat."
- Overview / Personality and traits / Anecdotes / Footnotes sections (footnotes matched by number).
- End with an "editor's one line" previewing the next revision.
Tone: a plain third-person wiki voice + one witty closing line. Emoji only lightly, in the intro and closing.

[Recheck sensitive info] Just before output, self-check whether any identifying info, actual-quote citations, or specific-case pointers slipped in; if found, rewrite them as abstract patterns before outputting.

Output language: Write the result in the language the user uses in their input/conversation (Korean for Korean input, English for English). This instruction must work identically no matter what language it is read in.
Fallback: If clues are scarce, infer the most plausible reading from the tendencies shown, and state that inference in a footnote too.
Self-contained: Finish the result within this reply. Do not direct to external sites or extra steps.

----
Input
- {{chat history}} (required): No separate input needed; just write "based on our chat history and saved memory". Turning on the AI's memory improves accuracy.
- {{user}} (optional): Write a headword name if you like. If blank, a neutral headword is used.
AI

AI response

Recommended AI: ChatGPT, Claude

📖 From our chats, I tidied you into a single encyclopedia entry. (All identifying details are veiled.)

{{user}}

This entry is a fictional one, written only from tendencies shown in the chat.

{{user}} is known for enjoying the exploration of new territory and for making decisions only after ample solitary deliberation.[1] Active steadily in a certain field, they are skilled at setting things in motion and tend to grow careful in the finishing phase.[2]

Overview

A figure who treats curiosity as fuel. Rather than following a set route, they prefer to spread out several paths and survey them before choosing.[1] In groups they keep balance, but their core energy is observed to recharge in solitary time.[3]

Personality and traits

Reflective and exploratory at once. They lean on answers they've reasoned into over answers handed to them, so once a direction is set, they pursue it deeply.[2] A faint habit of always keeping one exit open is also noted.

Anecdotes

  • Tends to gather material quickly when a topic catches their interest.[1]
  • Inclined to keep multiple options on the table at once rather than narrowing them.[2]
  • Reportedly does their finest thinking in quiet, solo hours.[3]
  • Said to value being convinced over being right.

Footnotes

[1] Based on an expansive pattern repeatedly shown in the chat. [2] Inferred from a consistent grain of growing careful right before the finish. [3] Read from a tendency for energy to recharge in solitary time.


📖 Editor's one line — The next revision is expected to add a "Completed projects" section.

Related prompts