대표_인용포스터.png

Scout Me Like an Athlete — A Transfer-Market Report

Turns the you revealed across our chats into a scouting report — position, play style, strengths and weaknesses, estimated transfer fee, and a manager's comment, played straight.

0 views·0 copies

Prompt text

Based on our conversations so far and anything saved in memory, write me up as a 'scouting report' — as if a scout watched me for several days like an athlete. Not an MBTI-style type list; use real sports-scouting voice, fully committed.

[Abstract sensitive info] Do not expose identifying details — identity, workplace, title, company, finances, family, health, location. Swap them for abstract phrasing. Keep personality, habits, and thinking style detailed, but at a level you'd be fine sharing a screenshot of.

Work rules:
1. Set one 'primary position' (e.g., attacking midfielder, defensive anchor, finisher striker, playmaker). One-line reason from revealed traits.
2. Describe 'play style' in 3-4 sentences — when they're strongest (early / mid / decisive moments) and how they get involved.
3. Give 2-3 'strengths' and 2-3 'areas to improve'. Strengths as concrete abilities; improvements as 'fixable habits' (no character bashing). Reason per item.
4. Add a 'manager's comment' as one blockquote paragraph — why to sign this player and where they're undervalued, with affection. Close warmly here, without fail.
5. Rate 'estimated transfer fee' as one of undervalued / fair / overvalued, with a one-line market-view reason (point out any underrated strength).

Forbidden: No quoting the user's actual words — use extracted abstract patterns only. No pointing at specific past chats. No belittling looks, health, ability, or intelligence. No diagnosis-like labels (defining a person with clinical terms).

Output format (markdown): one-line summary -> scouting overview (position fit / consistency / fee band) -> report fields (position, style, strengths, improvements) -> manager's comment (blockquote) -> estimated fee. Emoji only as seasoning.
Output language: Write the result in the language the user uses in conversation. This instruction must work identically in any language.
Self-contained: Finish within this reply. Do not direct to external sites or extra steps.
Fallback: If cues are thin, infer the most plausible read from revealed traits and state that inference as basis.
[Self-check] Right before output, check for identifying info, real quotes, or specific-case pointing; if found, rewrite into abstract patterns before outputting.

----
Input
- No input (based on accumulated conversation). Turn on the AI's memory for better accuracy. Results may be off on an AI you've just started using.
- {{preferred sport}} (optional): Name a sport (soccer, basketball, baseball, etc.) if you want one. If blank, the AI picks to match your traits.

I watched you for a few days with a scout's eye. Not an immediate signing — but in the right role, a clear specialist.

Scouting overview · Position fit A / Consistency B / Fee in the 'undervalued' band.

SCOUTING REPORT

  • Primary position: attacking midfielder — the one who sets up the play. Numbers are stronger in 'connect and design' than in finishing.
  • Play style: watches early, reads the flow, then intervenes — a delayed-entry type. Not the run-all-90 stamina profile, but high involvement in the decisive 15 minutes.
  • Strengths: vision (reading context), first touch (speed absorbing new topics). Tends to get calmer under pressure.
  • Areas to improve: finishing — repeatedly builds a great chance, then defers the final shot. 'Starting over finishing' shows up a lot.

Manager's comment

"A scouting sheet can't hold all the talent. This player has the smarts to know when to move — the problem is they underrate that in themselves. That's why the fee is low, and exactly why we buy."

Estimated fee

Currently 'undervalued'. The strengths (design, absorption) are the kind the market notices late, so one step of finishing and the price jumps.

Related prompts