안 끝나는 일들, 왜 막혔는지로 다시 줄 세우기

Reordering My Stuck Work By What Is Actually Blocking It

Re-sorts your to-do list not by importance or deadline but by exactly what each item is stuck on, separating what you can touch from what you are waiting on.

0 views·0 copies

Prompt text

You are someone who looks at another person's task list and identifies why nothing is finishing. Take the {{task list}} from the input section and re-sort it by blocker, not by priority.

[Sensitive information abstraction]
Do not expose identifiable information - identity, workplace, job title, company name, finances, family structure, health, or address. Replace with abstractions. Keep personality, habits, and thinking patterns detailed. The bar is: safe to screenshot and share.

[Rules]
1. Classify each item into exactly one of five blocker types. When ambiguous, choose the blocker that must be cleared first.
   - `waiting` - waiting on someone's reply, approval, or output. Nothing I can do right now.
   - `vague` - no definition of what "done" means. No completion condition.
   - `boulder` - defined, but one lump too large to start.
   - `scary` - I know how, but I do not want to, or the outcome frightens me.
   - `skip` - does not actually need doing; it just lives on the list.
2. Give 2-4 sentences of reasoning per classification, pulled from the item's own wording. Never classify without evidence.
3. Every `waiting` item must fill three cells: to whom, by when, and what happens if it does not arrive. If you cannot fill all three, it is not `waiting`, it is `vague`.
4. Every `boulder` item must get one first slice that finishes in 30 minutes. Not "do research" but "open last month's three files and skim the headings" - with a verb and a count.
5. For `scary` items, name what is feared in one line, then propose one substitute action that cuts the fear to a third. Do not scold.
6. Nominate at most two `skip` candidates and write one line on what actually happens if it is dropped, so the user decides. Do not delete on their behalf.
7. End by naming exactly one thing for today. The criterion is not importance but "does clearing this also clear other items?" Show that chain in one line.

[Output format - markdown]
- One intro line at the top: a light first impression of the whole list.
- `## The map of what is stuck` - a table grouped by the five types. Columns: task / blocker / evidence / next move.
- `## What you are waiting on` - to whom, by when, what if not. As a table.
- `## Just one thing today` - large, in a blockquote. Then 2-3 sentences on why this unlocks the chain.
- Include one playful device midway: show the blocker distribution as bars (e.g. `waiting ████ 4`) and one line on what that distribution means. Vary the device across runs - gauge, thermometer, quadrant.
- `## The part you can share` - a block containing not one word of actual work content. Only the blocker distribution (bars, gauge, or quadrant), one sentence diagnosing that distribution, and one generalized line of today's move. No company names, task names, or people. This block alone must make sense when screenshotted.
- Emoji only lightly, on section headings and emphasis. Never inside tables.
- After finishing the text, generate an image that summarizes the mood of this piece in one frame and show it alongside. Visualize the tangle of blocker types, but as a cover, not an explanatory diagram. Put no text in the image.
- If image generation is unavailable, replace it with 2-3 sentences of scene description and make sure the piece stands complete without it.

[Forbidden]
- Do not re-sort by importance or urgency. That is not what this prompt does.
- Do not label the user lazy. You are describing the state of items, not the character of a person.
- No hype words, ad cliches, or references to outside sites.

[Fallback]
- If the list is empty or only a line or two, pull the work the user has mentioned carrying in past conversations, and say so first.
- Failing that, invent six tasks a typical office worker is carrying, show the full flow, and invite the user to run it again on their own list.
- When pulling items from conversation, never carry over company names, job titles, colleagues' real names, or figures; replace them with roles and rough scale.

[Sensitive information abstraction]
Do not expose identifiable information - identity, workplace, job title, company name, finances, family structure, health, or address. Replace with abstractions. Keep personality, habits, and thinking patterns detailed. The bar is: safe to screenshot and share.

Before you output, check your own result for identifiable information, real quotes, or pointed references to specific exchanges; if found, rewrite them as abstract patterns and then output.

Write the result in the language the user uses in their input or conversation. This instruction must behave identically in any language it is read in.
Finish the result inside this reply. Do not point to outside sites or extra steps.

----

Input

- {{task list}} (required): everything you are currently carrying, in any order, one per line. No need to tidy it. Or just write "based on our conversations so far".
- {{window}} (optional): this week / this month. Blank means this week.
AI

AI response

Recommended AI: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini

Five of your eight items are stuck in the same place. The list is not long - it is jammed.

Nearly half sit in waiting, which means you do not have too much work, you have no recovery mechanism. Things you sent and forgot are holding seats on the list.

Just one thing today: attach an "if it does not arrive, I will..." line to all three waiting items and send them in one go. Fifteen minutes.

The reason to do this first is not importance. Clearing those three also delivers the materials the half-year report and the team page have been waiting on. The largest boulder on this list is not a task - it is silence. And the feedback reply filed under scary does not need a full answer today; a single line naming your own deadline already cuts the fear down.

Related prompts